|
July 2006
ESTATE PLANNING
Five Levels of Estate Planning This systematic approach to explaining estate planning will help your wealthy clients understand what strategies they need to use. The five levels of estate planning is a systematic approach for explaining estate planning to your wealthy clients in a way that they can easily follow. Which of the five levels they’ll need will depend on their particular objectives and circumstances.
Level one: the basic plan
To accomplish these objectives, use pour-over wills, revocable living trusts that allocate the decedent’s estate between a credit shelter trust and a marital trust, general powers of attorney and durable powers of attorney for health care and living wills. Level two: the irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT)
Level three: family
limited partnerships
Many clients would be more willing to make gifts to their children if they could continue to manage the gifted property. A family limited partnership or a family limited liability company can play a valuable role in this situation. The donor is typically the general partner or manager and in that capacity, continues to manage the FLP or FLLC’s assets. The donor can even take a reasonable management fee for his services as the general partner or manager. Moreover, by gifting FLP or FLLC interests to an ILIT, the FLP or FLLC’s income can be used to pay premiums, thereby freeing up the clients’ $12,000/$24,000 annual gift-tax exclusion for other types of gifts. Level four: QPRTs and GRATs
One technique is a qualified personal residence trust. A QPRT allows the grantor to transfer a residence or vacation home to a trust for the benefit of children, while retaining the right to use the residence for a term of years. By retaining the right to occupy the residence, the value of the remainder interest is reduced, along with the taxable gift. If the grantor survives the term, the residence (and the future appreciation thereon) are entirely removed from the grantor’s estate. Another technique is a grantor retained annuity. A GRAT is similar to a QPRT. The typical GRAT is funded with income-producing property such as subchapter S stock or FLP or FLLC interests. The GRAT pays the grantor a fixed annuity for a specified term of years. Because of the retained annuity, the gift to the remaindermen (the grantor’s children) is substantially less than the current value of the property. Both QPRTs and GRATs can be designed with terms long enough to reduce the value of the remainder interest passing to the children to a nominal amount or even to zero. However, if the grantor does not survive the stated term, the property is included in the grantor’s estate. Therefore, it is recommended that an ILIT be funded as a “hedge” against the grantor’s death prior to the end of the stated term. Level five: the zero estate-tax plan
With the typical marital credit shelter trust, when the first spouse dies, $3.5 million is allocated to the credit shelter trust and $16.5 million to the marital trust. No federal estate tax is due. However, at the surviving spouse’s death, the estate tax due is $5.85 million. The net result is that the children inherit only $14.15 million.
With the zero estate-tax plan, the couple gifts $2 million during their lifetime (using their annual gift-tax exclusions) to an ILIT (with generation-skipping provisions) funded with a $13 million second-to-die life insurance policy. These gifts reduce the estate value to $18 million. In addition, the couple’s living trusts each leave $3.5 million (the amount exempt from estate taxes) to their children upon the surviving spouse’s death. Also, the balance of their estate ($11 million) passes to a public charity or private foundation—estate-tax free. To summarize, the zero estate-tax plan delivers $20 million (i.e., $13 million from the ILIT and $7 million from the living trusts) to the children instead of $14.15 million; the charity receives $11 million instead of nothing and the IRS receives nothing, instead of $5.85 million. To the extent this article contains tax matters, it is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer, according to Circular 230. Julius H. Giarmarco, J.D., LL.M., is an estate-planning attorney with the law firm of Cox, Hodgman & Giarmarco, P.C., in Troy, Mich. His email address is jhg@disinherit-irs.com. Related Articles Estate Planning: How to Get Started Estate Planning for the 21st Century
© Advisor Today 2008. All rights reserved.
|
|